Related topics

"Show all" and statistics show only the first build
... take a look at the following picture. http://www.neowin. net/forum/uploads/post-106028-1143634675.png On the left is the close/minimise UI icons from recent builds, and the one on the right is an older build. They used to look really lush, and had the outside glow stuff, now they are just horrible, non glassy,

Newer builds than 347?
David T. Johnson djohn...@isomedia.com mozilla dev ports os2 Peter Weilbacher wrote: David T. Johnson wrote: Do ANY of the newer Seamonkey trunk builds (<6 The newer builds that I've tried will not even load and run, even for a few seconds. If you have gotten one of the newer builds of Seamonkey to load and run

Concerns with newer builds and HapSTR runs
Unfortunately, not every build by every company includes the making of an SDK or symbol files. On the other hand, fortunately, most applications developed for one build or version will run under newer builds or versions, so unless what you're developing requires system services unique to a particular build,

Newer builds than 347?
Jon Lange dla...@infi.net comp os ms-windows misc I have seen alot of talk on this newsgroup about newer builds than the one that I got in the Preview. Is there any advantage to these newer builds? If so, how can I get them? Thanks, Jon....

Getting newer builds?
google.com wrote: Issue 61: NSFileHandle offsetInFile doesn't work in newer cocotron builds (71...74?)http://code.google.com/p/cocotron/issues/detail? id=61 Comment #1 by glasspusher: Correction: offsetInFile isn't implemented in any cocotron version, up to and including r82. Some versions of cocotron handle this

Getting newer builds?
Bugs can be filed and fixed to make packages work with the newer automake before it becomes the default. Transitions may be some work, but they shouldn't result in too much This rule automatically makes two builds in a row give identical results (except for time stamps). Of course this is a separate point.

UI elements worse in newer builds?
... other tasks shown in the Tasks pane, the Open action is HARDER to obtain! This should be corrected (an Open Task should be placed in the Tasks list also). If you have newer builds than 2462 please check out for this and post back if anything is done about it yet. Thank you all very very much Best Regards, Sorin.

Windows 98 beta 3 ==> newer builds
google.com wrote: Issue 61: NSFileHandle offsetInFile doesn't work in newer cocotron builds (71...74?)http://code.google.com/p/cocotron/issues/detail?id=61 Comment #1 by glasspusher: Correction: offsetInFile isn't implemented in any cocotron version, up to and including r82. Some versions of cocotron handle this

UI elements worse in newer builds?
My question is, how are you people getting the newer drops? I tried the Windows Update button and all that did was add some shut down updates and a couple other things. Any help would be appreciated. MS Update will only update drivers and some other crap. MS isn't going to let you download new OS's.

Newer builds than 1314
There is also the possibility of Trojan code being in the unauthorized builds. -- Michael Stevens Associate Expert. Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone "Tazman" <tazman_j...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:627401c1127d$18deef80$a5e62ecf@tkmsftngxa07... I keep hearing about these newer builds

Developping for GEOS
Thomas F Lee t...@psp.co.uk comp os ms-windows misc In article <3mpl6u$5t1@lucy. infi.net> dla...@infi.net "Jon Lange" writes: I have seen alot of talk on this newsgroup about newer builds than the one that I got in the Preview. Correct - I, for example, am running 435 on my laptop. This is _not_ a recommended

ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile)
The build will apply the debian and m68k specific patches and create a dir debian/build/build_m68k_none_atari first it builds a documentation and that takes If somebody was building 2.6.24 (Roman's patch seems to be against something newer than 2.6.18) or backported the NFBLOCK for 2.6.18 and cross-compiled I'd

9.50B Build 9613 - Case sensitive personal data match
My question is, how are you people getting the newer drops? I tried the Windows Update button and all that did was add some shut down updates and a couple other things. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you, Jim (please post any replies within group)

Bug#397939: Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file
Chris Happel chap...@cyberramp.net comp os ms-windows nt pre-release The only newer build I've heard of is the one going into production for retail sale. (coming soon to a store near you?) Chris "Kenneth Adamson" <k...@vrlemmings.com> wrote: Where would one go about obtaining the newer builds of NT 4.0?

Why OS/2 is here to stay
Com microsoft public whistler professional general On Fri, 25 May 2001 23:40:08 +1000, "Jose Martins" <j...@acidsoftware.com> wrote: I dont know how to put it, but Microsoft changed something in Windows XP between builds 2465 and 2474 that makes the 3DFX Voodoo3's official OpenGL supported drivers no longer work

Newer builds than 1314
Jody chris wrote: I re-ran one input file with the -j1 option, and it came out with flat posteriors. My t's were not updating at all in the first output file, while they were using a previous build. My HapSTR input files include the number of STRs directly after the J (J10 in this case). What could be causing this?

ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile)
Michael Taylor n...@none.com microsoft public win98 pre-release I am just curious, does the Windows Upgrade Wizard update Windows 98 beta 3 (build 1650.8) to a newer build? I ask because a few days ago I ordered Windows 98 from the Consumer Preview Program. Using the Windows Update Wizard, is it worth upgrading or

Getting newer builds?
The problem that we're running into is that the Mach-O headers are build based off of the MacOS Support folder in the Metrowerks folder. That locks us to the APIs in that folder. It seems to me that the MacHeadersCarbon project for building the headers should be using the System:Library:Frameworks folder to get its

Issue 558 in support: googlecode_upload.py broken on OSX Leopard
If anyone has successfully built the newer builds of Mozilla on Irix 6.5, let me know, I am interested in seeing this. Kevin Devine, Webmaster at Osborn International "If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something." kdev...@osborn.com http://www.osborn.com -----Original Message-----

Javascript-Problem *only* in newer builds such as [1129]
chris chrisgign...@gmail.com Isolation-with-Migration I re-ran one input file with the -j1 option, and it came out with flat posteriors. My t's were not updating at all in the first output file, while they were using a previous build. My HapSTR input files include the number of STRs directly after the J (J10 in